That would affect MASP size, scope, and very likely flight operations as well. The poles are already in place, but a larger issue now lingers on the horizon.īased on the pool of data produced by the two MASP’s actual land area as written in the pile of original plans going back some forty years at least, which when scrutinized by both the agency and Witt himself might produce a very real dilemma. Based on old compiled data going back many years and revised data as culled by the second agency representative who saw MASP a being correct on the encroachment issue as opposed to the first regulators interpretation of the data they had. In seeking clarification on the pole matter and MASP airspace in general with the agency, Witt and Drees ran into two different interpretations by two different representatives of the agency. It partly consists of a formula created by the agency for ruling on what does or doesn’t constitute a flight hazard and it rules on such matters based on the regulation. PART 77, is the FAA’s regulation concerning the ‘Safe, Efficient Use, and Preservation of Navigable Airspace’. CEO at the time Witt sought clarification on the matter and dove in with current CEO Drees only to essentially be shut down on the pole matter by the FAA and yet in acting to maintain the safety of flights at the airport they encountered ‘PART 77’. They just did it with seemingly no regard to the airport whatsoever. ![]() ![]() The FAA did not notify the airport when it gave approval for the higher poles, and at no time did the board have an opportunity for input or even advance knowledge of the approval given by the agency. With tenants such as Virgin Galactic, The Spaceship Company, Scaled Composites, and many local aviators like Dick Rutan, Al and Cathy Hansen and hundreds more that fly in and out of MASP with regularity. They are very close to the airport creating a flight path hazard to one of the most iconic and historically significant airports in the world, and one that sees a great deal of flight activity on a regular basis. The situation involves the Federal Aviation Administration’s approval to an energy developer in Mojave that allowed the installation of new transmission lines some 50 to 60 feet taller than the regular ones. ![]() I would not recommend this store, except for a girl tech named Anne, who was able to figure out the 2 interior panels and install the forgotten sensor in about 20mins.Mojave - At the most recent meeting of The Mojave Air and Space Port board, the main topic of discussion came back to a situation that just sprang up back in September in the waning days of Stu Witt’s presence and one that he, new CEO Karina Drees, and the board find themselves having to address rather quickly. And still no refund for the worst SafeLite experience ever. Well it has been 2 months and many phone calls of unkept promises from the manager. ![]() Note: Ford only charges 100.00 for the same recalibration. He was sorry for the trouble and agreed to refund me 150.00 dollars for the recalibration fee they charged me 250.00 dollars for. So I drove the hour to the store and met with the manager. After 2 hours being on the phone with his techs in the store, he explained I would need to bring the car into the shop to fix. He could not figure out how to put them back and a missing rain sensor, that the other tech kept and forgot to give it to him. However when trying to reassemble my SUV, he was left with an extra screw and 2 panels in the interior. Tuesday rolls around and the tech comes out and addresses the crack windshield.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |